1 |
||||
For most of these, more than one
answer was possible depending on how you interpreted the scene described by the sentence and the literal meaning of the sentence. I lay out here what answers I accepted. |
||||
a |
The pillar cast a shadow against
the wall |
|||
1 |
None The scene described contains no actual or factive motion. Nothing is really moving. | |||
2 |
Shadow The sentence uses a motion verb 'cast', which conveys that the pillar is participating in an act of throwing in which the shadow is a fictively moving entity | |||
3 |
No Although
there may be mental imagery involved, the source of the above fictive
motion is not a result of tracing a mental path |
|||
b |
The bakery is across the street from the bank. | |||
1 |
None
The scene described is stationary. There is no factive
motion occurring, nor is the bakery likely to be understood as having
actually got to its location by starting at the bank and locomoting
across the street. |
|||
2 |
NoneorBakery You may have viewed
this as a kind of mental scanning that conceptualizer does from bank to
bakery. In this case no participant is moving ficitively, answer
3 should have been Yes.
You might also have viewed the bakery as having moved
(fictively of course) from the bank to its location across the street.
In this case, answer 3 could have been either YesorNo (with
or without mental scanning) |
|||
c |
The book is on the table. | |||
1 |
None
Scene described is staionary |
|||
2 |
None
No language in sentence suggests ficitive motion either |
|||
3 |
No
No fictive motion, no scanning |
|||
d |
There was a house every now and then through the valley | |||
1 |
Noneorspeaker Could be interpreted
as a general description of scene (asserts what was generally true
about the land at some point) or as a description of speaker's
personal travel experience. In the first case there is no actual
motion. In the second case, the speaker did actually travel
through the valley. |
|||
2 |
None or gneneralized conceptualizer or
speaker or houses If you said there was no factive
motion, then you should have indicated that there was some kind of
fictive motion which would involve the speaker or a generalized
conceptualizer (i.e. any person who viewed that scene) . You
might also have said None and
then attributed the fictive motion to a mental scanning operation.
Finally, you might have said the houses underwent ficitive
motion. This is acceptable too, since the houses could be viewed
collectively as an entity that appears and disappears over time
(marginally a kind of motion) |
|||
3 |
Yesif
in 2 you said None, Yes or No otherwise |
|||
e |
The trees get shorter at higher altitudes. | |||
1 |
NoneUnlike
d, this sentence does not lend itself to an interpretation in which the
speaker is actually moving (note use of simple present rather than
present progressive--The trees are getting shorter a higher altitudes
might be interpreted in this way however) |
|||
2 |
Noneorgeneralized conceptualizer or speaker
Fictive motion can be ascribed to fictively construing a person
(speaker or conceptualizer) moving up a hill or to mental scaning
operation (person not conceived of as moving up hill but rather person
is stationary and eyes scan up the hill) |
|||
3 |
Yes
(if answer 2 was none)
otherwise, yes or no |
|||
f |
The telephone poles are rushing by at 80 miles per hour | |||
1 |
Speaker
Barring the unlikely reading in which magical telephone poles (or
maybe telephone poles on a moving truck) are actually rushing past,
this would be understood as a describing a scene in which the
speaker is actually moving |
|||
2 |
Telephone poles Telephone poles only appear to be moving. Motion is real, but local frame is adopted | |||
3 |
No fictive motion is attributable to adopting local perspective and describing apparent, but not factive motion | |||
g |
1 |
None
No real motion occurs. Sentence does not describe a
scene in which a body is actually increasing in size |
||
2 |
Noneorbody or gestation period . The best
answer is none since the sense
of motion derives from a mental scanning operation through a
non-spatial domain. The other two answers are okay since they
literally describe entities growing and lengthening. |
|||
3 |
Yes
Reader is invited to imagine scanning through an abstract
scale of body sizes each of which corresponds to a gestation period |
|||
h |
A mountain range lies between Canada and Mexico | |||
None
no actual motion described |
||||
None
no language encourages interpretation with fictive motion |
||||
No |
||||
i |
Her clothes were strewn all over the floor. | |||
1 |
Noneorclothes In one possible
interpretation clothes are literally in a state resulting from having
been deliberately strewn thus they a particpant that has factively
moved. In another interpretation there is no assumption that
clothes got into their current spatial configuration via any deliberate
strewing process |
|||
2 |
Noneorclothes If you said clothes
factively moved, then they did not ficitively move, and answer should
have been none. If you
said nothing factively moved, answer should have been that clothes fictively moved. You
could also have said that nothing moved ficitively, attributing fictive
motion to mental scanning |
|||
3 |
Yes
If answers 1 & 2 were both none, this answer should have
been yes. Otherwise, yes or no |
|||
j |
The water gets deeper as you swim away from the shore. | |||
1 |
None
This sentence does not describe a scene in which you or anyone is actually
swimming. Rather, it describes a general truth about a body of
water |
|||
2 |
Youorspeaker or generalized
conceptualizer or water or none Two kinds of ficitive
motion could have been mentioned. Either a) some person fictively
construed as swimming into the body of water or b) the body of
water is portrayed as actually deeping over time. You
could also have said there was no fictively moving entity and
attributed the sense of motion to mental scanning |
|||
3 |
Yesif
you said none in 2,
yes or no otherwise |
|||
k |
As the Mardi Gras floats passed by, strings of beads gathered on the sidewalk. | |||
1 |
floats
or beads The
floats are actually moving perpendicular to viewers line of gaze.
Beads are also factively moving since they are being thrown out
from floats toward viewer |
|||
2 |
beads
beads are also ficitively moving since they are portrayed
as 'gathering' |
|||
3 |
No
apparent motion caused by real temporal change in scene |
|||
2 |
15 points total (each answer
worth 5 points) |
|||
The hypothesis underlying these
experiments was that if people simulate motion while comprehending FM
sentences, those sentences should be processed more quickly after reading 1) stories describing short distances compared to stories describing long distances 2) stories describing easy terrain compared to stories describing difficult terrain 3) stories describing fast motion compared to stories describing slow motion |
||||
3 |
9 points total (each answer
worth 3 points) |
|||
1) yes 2)
yes 3) yes |
||||
4 |
20 points total |
|||
Congruency effect had to do with
observation that sentences with 'fast' verbs took longer to process
than neutral verbs, and neutral verbs longer than 'slow' verbs after
reading stories describing rough or difficult terrain. Since
difficult terrain tends to slow down travel, it was suggested that
the longer response time for fast verbs, and quicker response
time for slow verbs was due to the coherence or lack of coherence
between terrain type and speed of travel conveyed by verb. For full credit, you should have described the observation and importantly, explained how terrain type and speed of travel are linked. |
||||
5 |
30 points total |
|||
Analog representations
bear some resemblance to perception. They are iconic and
continuous. Experiments which demonstrate that interaction with
one's mental model bears similarities to interaction with the real
world provide evidence of analog representation. In Kosslyn's map
experiment , subjects' decision times in naming distances between
familiar buildings on a college campus is directly proportional to
actual distances. This suggests mental models of campus is analog
and mental scanning through model is analogous to moving on campus. For full credit, should have described what an analog representation was, what Kosslyn's experiment showed, and how this constitued evidence of analog representation. |